What do the texts mean to us?
What about cultural relativity?
Why do we need to think about Application?
Sometimes there’s no problem:
2 Tim. 4:13
When you come, bring the cloak that I left with Carpus at Troas, and my scrolls, especially the parchments.
2 Tim. 2:3
Endure hardship with us like a good soldier of Christ Jesus.
But sometimes there is a problem:
We have a lack of consistency because of:
Theological heritage
Ecclesiastical (church) traditions
Cultural norms
Felt needs
For example…
1 Tim 5:23—Is it only a personal note?
(Stop drinking only water, and use a little wine because of your stomach and your frequent illnesses. )
What about 2 Tim. 3:14-16? Is it only a personal note too?
But as for you, continue in what you have learned and have become convinced of, because you know those from whom you learned it, 15 and how from infancy you have known the holy Scriptures, which are able to make you wise for salvation through faith in Christ Jesus.
...we need to look carefully.
Culture:
Long hair: 1 Cor. 11:14 Does not the very nature of things teach you that if a man has long hair, it is a disgrace to him
(but what about 11:15?) but that if a woman has long hair, it is her glory? For long hair is given to her as a covering.
Church Traditions
1 Cor. 14:34-35 He who speaks in a tongue edifies himself
1 Cor. 14:1-5, 26-33, 39-40 and eagerly desire spiritual gifts, especially the gift of prophecy.
Church order: 1 Tim. 5:17; Titus 1:5 The elders who direct the affairs of the church well are worthy of double honor
Widows: 1 Tim. 5:3-15 Give proper recognition to those widows who are really in need
Infant baptism: 1 Cor. 1:16; 7:14; Col. 2:11-12 Yes, I also baptized the household of Stephanas
Theological Heritage
.....Arminianism (free will) gets around some verses
Rom. 8:30 And those he predestined, he also called…
Rom. 9:18-24 Therefore God has mercy on whom he wants to have mercy, and he hardens whom he wants to harden
Gal. 1:15 But when God, who set me apart from birth…
Eph. 1:4-5 For he chose us in him before the creation of the world
.....Calvinism gets around others:
1 Cor. 10:1-13 So, if you think you are standing firm, be careful that you don’t fall!
2 Peter 2:20-22 It would have been better for them not to have known the way of righteousness, than to have known it and then to turn their backs on the sacred command
Heb. 6:4-6 It is impossible for those who have …shared in the Holy Spirit, 5 who have tasted the goodness of the word of God … if they fall away, to be brought back to repentance
We need rules to be consistent.
The Basic Rule:
A text cannot mean what it never meant to its author or his recipients
i.e., the true meaning of the Biblical text is what God originally intended it to mean when it was first spoken.
Some disregard the commands about seeking spiritual gifts because of 1 Cor. 13:10, but this cannot refer to Scripture’s completion.
What about 2nd meanings in prophecy?--We can't be the ones to give it the second meaning--we are not inspired.
The Second Rule:
Whenever our situation is like those who lived in the the first-century, God’s Word to us is the same as his Word to them.
Col. 3:2 Therefore, as God’s chosen people, holy and dearly loved, clothe yourselves with compassion, kindness, humility, gentleness and patience.
If our situation is like theirs, the application is the same.
--Long hair-cultural situation was different
-- “All have sinned”-our situation is the same
Three Difficulties in Interpretation
1. The Problem of Extended Application
--Three examples
example 1
1 Cor 3:16-17 “If anyone destroys God’s temple (the church), God will destroy him…”
Can we then also conclude that God will punish the believer, indwelt by the Spirit, who abuses his own body?
example 2
1 Cor 3:10-15 If it is burned up, he [the church leader] will suffer loss; he himself will be saved…
Can we then say that believers will be judged but will be saved (as well as the poor church builders)?
....Should we extend the application?
Why try to figure out what is being said in the first place if one is just going to change what the text originally intended?
And one can find other texts that support that point. There is no need to use this text.
example 3
2 Cor. 6:14 “Do not be yoked together with unbelievers.”
The passage doesn’t clearly refer to marriage, but it isn’t clear what it refers to.
Can we then apply it since the original meaning isn’t clear?
It appears that it is referring to idolatry, forbidding participation at idol feasts. But since we don’t know for sure, can we apply it to marriage?
Perhaps we can , but only because we can support the principle from other Scripture.
2. The Problem of Situations that no longer Exist
----1 Cor. 8:10 Eating at idol feasts forbidden
What is the Principle? Now apply the principle in genuinely comparable situations
Participating in eating is forbidden if it causes a weaker brother to sin.
Does this mean we are not to do something that someone else feels is wrong?
1 Cor. 8:8 Food is declared to be indifferent: What else should we put in this category?
1. According to the Epistles:food, drink, observance of days are matters of indifference
2. Things are not inherently moral, but are cultural
3. The sin lists….[Rom 1:29-30 They have become filled with every kind of wickedness, evil, greed and depravity. They are full of envy, murder, strife, deceit and malice. They are gossips, slanderers, God-haters, insolent, arrogant and boastful; they invent ways of doing evil; they disobey their parents; they are senseless, faithless, heartless, ruthless. 1 Cor 6:9-10 Neither the sexually immoral nor idolaters nor adulterers nor male prostitutes nor homosexual offenders 10 nor thieves nor the greedy nor drunkards nor slanderers nor swindlers will inherit the kingdom of God.]…. never include cultural items.
3. The Problem of Cultural Relativity
What are some general guidelines that will help us see what is cultural and what is not?
1.What is Central and what is Secondary?
--Central core of Bible:
Salvation, sin, Christ
--Secondary items
Holy kiss, Head coverings,Charismatic gifts
2. What does the NT see as moral and immoral. (See “sin” lists—e.g. 1 Cor. 6:9
1Co 6:9 Do not be deceived: Neither the sexually immoral nor idolaters nor adulterers nor male prostitutes nor homosexual offenders nor thieves nor the greedy nor drunkards nor slanderers nor swindlers will inherit the kingdom of God.)
3. Note where the NT is consistent and where it reflects differences.
Uniform testimony
Love
Unity
Against hatred
Against stealing
Against murder
Diverse testimony
Women’s ministries (Phoebe a deacon-Rom. 16:1-2; Junia an apostle Rom 16:7)
Retention of wealth
Food offered to idols
4. Note how the differences between the 1st and 21st centuries that might affect understanding.
---Women’s education
---Attitude towards government
5. Show Christian Love
We may differ on interpretation, but let us do this is a spirit of love. We can work together to try to come to an agreement, and if not, agree to disagree.
Case Study: Homosexuality
Is it culturally relative?
Is the homosexuality spoken against in the NT abusive and is “monogamous” homosexuality a different matter?
Rom 1:24-28 is not abusive (“inflamed with lust for one another”)
The whole Bible always speaks against homosexuality
It is included in sin lists